Data Card
Microsoft Teams faces Illinois class action over alleged voiceprint collection without consent
A class action filed February 5, 2026 alleges Microsoft Teams collected and stored voiceprints through its transcription and voice-to-text features without the disclosures or written consent required by Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act.
2026-02-17CC-BY-4.0privacybipalitigationusa
About
Key Facts
- BIPA requires written notice and consent before collecting biometric data; statutory damages range from $1,000 per negligent violation to $5,000 per intentional or reckless violation.
- The lawsuit parallels other enterprise platform cases, including scrutiny of Verizon's Voice ID feature, extending BIPA exposure into workplace collaboration tools.
- Transcription features in video conferencing are increasingly central to enterprise workflows, making voiceprint collection a growing area of regulatory attention.
Card Text
A class action filed February 5, 2026 alleges Microsoft Teams collected and stored voiceprints through its transcription and voice-to-text features without the disclosures or written consent required by Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act.
Key facts:
- BIPA requires written notice and consent before collecting biometric data; statutory damages range from $1,000 per negligent violation to $5,000 per intentional or reckless violation.
- The lawsuit parallels other enterprise platform cases, including scrutiny of Verizon's Voice ID feature, extending BIPA exposure into workplace collaboration tools.
- Transcription features in video conferencing are increasingly central to enterprise workflows, making voiceprint collection a growing area of regulatory attention.